Forced Compliance - Revision history

WikiSysop at 19:30, 4 February 2022

2022-02-04T19:30:31Z

WikiSysop at 22:17, 16 April 2021

2021-04-16T22:17:35Z

Admin at 20:29, 1 May 2017

2017-05-01T20:29:23Z

Admin at 01:07, 19 June 2016

2016-06-19T01:07:15Z

Admin at 18:39, 8 November 2013

2013-11-08T18:39:04Z

Admin at 04:19, 12 October 2013

2013-10-12T04:19:15Z

Admin at 04:18, 12 October 2013

2013-10-12T04:18:21Z

Admin at 04:17, 12 October 2013

2013-10-12T04:17:55Z

Admin at 04:17, 12 October 2013

2013-10-12T04:17:07Z

Admin at 04:16, 12 October 2013

2013-10-12T04:16:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:30, 4 February 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:


−	'''THIS MATERIAL ~~©2008–2021~~ SALLY A. APPLIN AND MICHAEL D. FISCHER. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.'''	+	'''THIS MATERIAL ©2008–2022 SALLY A. APPLIN AND MICHAEL D. FISCHER. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.'''

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:17, 16 April 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:


−	'''THIS MATERIAL ~~©2008–2017~~ SALLY A. APPLIN AND MICHAEL D. FISCHER. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.'''	+	'''THIS MATERIAL ©2008–2021 SALLY A. APPLIN AND MICHAEL D. FISCHER. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.'''

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:29, 1 May 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:


−	'''THIS MATERIAL ~~©1978–2016~~ SALLY A. APPLIN AND MICHAEL D. FISCHER. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.'''	+	'''THIS MATERIAL ©2008–2017 SALLY A. APPLIN AND MICHAEL D. FISCHER. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.'''

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:07, 19 June 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+
		+
		+	'''THIS MATERIAL ©1978–2016 SALLY A. APPLIN AND MICHAEL D. FISCHER. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.'''
		+
		+
	'''''Forced Compliance'' - Applin, S.A. and Fischer, M.D. (2011)'''		'''''Forced Compliance'' - Applin, S.A. and Fischer, M.D. (2011)'''

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:39, 8 November 2013
Line 8:		Line 8:


−	''... ~~demeans~~ the buyer and user~~, making him~~ do the work formerly thought the obligation of the seller, who used to have to stock numerous sizes. It's like such other (prole) features of the contemporary scene as the jet plane and the supermarket, where convenience for the seller is disguised by publicity and fraud to pass for the convenience for the buyer. [2:70]''	+	''... the buyer and user ... do the work formerly thought the obligation of the seller, who used to have to stock numerous sizes. It's like such other (prole) features of the contemporary scene as the jet plane and the supermarket, where convenience for the seller is disguised by publicity and fraud to pass for the convenience for the buyer. [2:70]''


−	This has been described in great detail first by Toffler [3], who coined the term “Prosumer.” Forced compliance differs from the idea of the prosumer in that it is concerned primarily with the process and lack of choice for a labor task; the notion being that due to certain structures (primarily the replacement of service staff in industry with algorithms), people are forced to go online to complete processes vital to their livelihoods.	+	This has been described in great detail first by Toffler [3], who coined the term “Prosumer,” and later by Kotler [4] who expanded on its application. Forced compliance differs from the idea of the prosumer in that it is concerned primarily with the process and lack of choice for a labor task; the notion being that due to certain structures (primarily the replacement of service staff in industry with algorithms), people are forced to go online to complete processes vital to their livelihoods.

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
-For a prosumer, the choice upon the consumer whether or not to participate in the “labor process” is largely still available [4]. With forced compliance, there is no choice or alternate to processes that are only available online and must be engaged with. Thus, forced compliance shares a foundation with the prosumer, but differs in its lack of choice of experience for the individual. The only choice for the individual in having “forced labor” in forced compliance is when (within a time frame) that person is required to complete that labor task. Thus, they have some flexibility to do those processes asynchronously. It is the outcome from this lack of choice for labor for forced compliance that contributes, in part, to the adaptation of asynchronicity. The unintended consequence of complications from the asynchronicity that is created from the various configurations that emerge from, in part, this multiplexed behavior. The complexity of these relationships can only multiply with the growth of smartphone market share.
+For a prosumer, the choice upon the consumer whether or not to participate in the “labor process” is largely still available [4]. With forced compliance, there is no choice or alternate to processes that are only available online and must be engaged with. Thus, forced compliance shares a foundation with the prosumer, but differs in its lack of choice of experience for the individual. The only choice for the individual in having “forced labor” in forced compliance is when (within a time frame) that person is required to complete that labor task. Thus, they have some flexibility to do those processes asynchronously. It is the outcome from this lack of choice for labor for forced compliance that contributes, in part, to the adaptation of asynchronicity. The unintended consequence of complications from the asynchronicity that is created from the various configurations that emerge from, in part, this multiplexed behavior.
 . Applin, S. Council Interview with Sally Applin. October 28, 2011. Online: http://www.theinternetofthings.eu/content/council-interview-sally-applin
 . Fussel, P. Class: A Guide Through the American Status System; Simon & Schuster Touchstone: New York, USA, 1983.
 . Toffler, A. Future Shock. William Morrow and Co: New York, USA, 1980.
 . Kotler, P. The Prosumer Movement: a New Challenge For Marketers. In Advances in Consumer Research 13, pp. 510-513. (ed.) Richard J. Lutz. Proceedings of the Association for Consumer Research: Provo, UT, 1986.  Online: http://www.acrwebsite.org/search/view-conference-proceedings.aspx?Id=6542

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 Many facets of modern life are beginning to be designed to require not only network connectivity, but also computer access. We refer to this as "Forced Compliance."
 ''Forced Compliance'' (Applin and Fischer) is a subset of what Fussel [2] describes (with regard to the self-adjusting baseball style cap) as being something that:
-''demeans the buyer and user, making him do the work formerly thought the obligation of the seller, who used to have to stock numerous sizes. It's like such other (prole) features of the contemporary scene as the jet plane and the supermarket, where convenience for the seller is disguised by publicity and fraud to pass for the convenience for the buyer. [2:70]''
+''... demeans the buyer and user, making him do the work formerly thought the obligation of the seller, who used to have to stock numerous sizes. It's like such other (prole) features of the contemporary scene as the jet plane and the supermarket, where convenience for the seller is disguised by publicity and fraud to pass for the convenience for the buyer. [2:70]''
 This has been described in great detail first by Toffler [3], who coined the term “Prosumer.” Forced compliance differs from the idea of the prosumer in that it is concerned primarily with the process and lack of choice for a labor task; the notion being that due to certain structures (primarily the replacement of service staff in industry with algorithms), people are forced to go online to complete processes vital to their livelihoods.